Stewart's 14 years of experience as an expert witness includes:
  •  17 patent litigations completed or underway
  •  Expert testimony provided in both ITC & jury trials
  •  Expert opinion has prevailed in all 5 cases to date
  •  Written 15 Expert and Rebuttal reports
  •  Over 150 hours of court deposition experience
  •  Claim Constructions, Markman Hearings
  •  Infringement and patent validity analysis

An edited list of patent and consulting experience is provided
below.  If necessary an un-edited list can also be provided to
resolve any potential conflict-of-interest questions.  
Patent Litigation
Roger Stewart's Consulting & Patent Litigation Experience:
Below is a best-effort summary of all work done as a technical expert witness, patent consultant, or technical
consultant.   

1996-1999 Semiconductor Pat Litig  Harris Semiconductor v. Lucky Goldstar, et al
   Semiconductor patent dispute involving '005 & '241 patents authored by Roger Stewart
   
Attorney/Firm: Harry Deffebach & Mitch Evander, attorneys at Harris Semiconductor
   
Responsibilities: Served as a factual witness for my own patents on behalf of Harris Semiconductor which
included helping to get the case assigned to Virginia, writing & reviewing expert reports, doing 80 hours of
depositions in several different cases and preparations for serving as a factual witness at trial.
   
Resolution: The last of these cases came within a few days of the trial date before the defendants reached a
settlement with Harris Semiconductor and signed a patent licensing agreement.  All of the defendants settled out of
court with Harris Semiconductor signing patent licensing agreements worth more than 100 $M.

1999-2003   Display & RFID, Technical & Patent  Alien Technology Corporation employment 1999-2002 plus
work under Consulting Agreement in 2003

2000            Display Patent Litig Sanyo Electric Co., Inc. v. Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., LTD
     
Attorney/Firm: Kenneth R. Glick, attorney at Morrison & Foester LLP
     
Responsibilities:  Worked as a potential testifying expert witness including reviewing patents and patent
prosecution history.
     
Resolution:  This case settled out-of-court in 2000 before depositions.

2000-2001   Display Patent Litig NEC Corporation v. LG.Philips LCD., Ltd.
     
Attorney/Firm: David Owen, attorney at Foley & Lardner LLP
     
Responsibilities: Worked as a potential testifying expert witness reviewing NECs '816 & '883 patents, patent
prosecution history, claim constructions, and products for potential patent infringement.
     Resolution: This case settled out-of-court in 2001 before depositions.

2002-2003   RFID Tech & Patent  MIT Consulting Agreement

2002-2003   RFID Patents   Company-1 Consulting Agreement

2003            RFID Patents   Company-2 Consulting Agreement

2003            RFID Patents   Company-3 Consulting Agreement

2003            RFID Patents   Company-4 Consulting Agreement

2003            RFID Patents   Company-5 Consulting Agreement

2003            RFID Patents   Company-6 Consulting Agreement

2003            RFID Technical North Dakota State University Consulting Subcontract Agreement

2003-2005   RFID Patents Kathy & Bill Lane Consulting Agreement

2003-2005   Display Tech & Patent  ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc. Consulting Agreement

2003-2005   RFID Tech & Patent  Intelleflex Corporation, 2003 Consulting Agmt plus employment 2003-2005

2004            Semiconductor Patent Litig  Litigation-5
     Semiconductor patent dispute involving the '241 patent authored by Roger Stewart.
     
Attorney/Firm: xxx
     
Responsibilities: Served as a factual witness for my own patents and for other RCA patents.  
     
Resolution: xxx

2004-2005   RFID Technical Company-7 Consulting Agreement

2004-2005   RFID Technical Company-8 Consulting Agreement

2004-2007   Display Technical Company-9 Consulting Agreement

2005            RFID Patents Company-10 Consulting Agreement

2005            RFID Patents Company-11  Consulting Agreement

2005-2006   RFID Tech & Patent Applied Wireless ID, 2005 Consulting Agreement plus employment 2005-2006

2005-2006   Display Patent Litig  LG.Philips LCD., Ltd. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes
     
Attorney/Firm:  David Owen, attorney at Howrey LLP
     
Responsibilities: Worked as a testifying expert witness for defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes which
included reviewing patents, patent prosecution history, products for potential patent infringement, Markman
Hearing, authoring expert & rebuttal reports, doing depositions, authoring pre-trial expert reports, authoring
numerous related motions, testifying as a expert witness to a jury in Los Angeles Federal Court, cross-examination,
and re-direct.
    
Resolution: After deliberating for a full week, the jury in November '06 handed down a mixed verdict.  The jury
found Chunghwa to be "not guilty" of any infringement of claims #10 & #11 of the '449 patent on which I had
testified as an expert witness.

2005 ---       RFID Patent Litigation Intermec v. Symbol Corporation
     Attorney/Firm: Bruce R. Zisser, attorney at Bright and Lorig LLP
     
Responsibilities:  Worked as a potential testifying expert witness reviewing patents, patent prosecution
history, products for potential patent infringement, preparing reports on claim constructions, and preparations for
Markman Hearing.
     
Resolution: This case settled out-of-court in 2004 the day before the scheduled Markman Hearing after
Symbol agreed to sign a licensing agreement with Intermec.  

2006            Display Patents Lehigh University Consulting Agreement

2006-2008   Display Patent Litig  Positive Technologies, Inc. v. BenQ America Corp, Mitsubishi, et. al.
     
Attorney/Firm:  Evan Finkel attorney at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
     
Responsibilities: Patent review, analysis, and advice.
     
Resolution: Case settled out of court in March, 2008.

2007            Display Patent Litig Acer Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard
     
Attorney/Firm: Attorney at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
     
Responsibilities: Minimal time reviewing published US Patents and a Protective Order. No confidential
information exchanged under this Agreement.
     
Resolution: Unknown.

2007 ---       Semiconductor Tech Company-12 Consulting Agreement         

2007 ---       RFID Patents Company-13 Consulting Agreement        

2007 ---       RFID Patents Company-14 Consulting Agreement

2007 ---       RFID Patents Company-15 Consulting Agreement

2007 ---       RFID Patents Company-16 Consulting Agreement

2007 ---       Display Patent Litig  Litigation-11       
     
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
     
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
     
Resolution: Prevailed in two ITC bench trials, other litigation ongoing

2007 ---       Display Patent Litig  Litigation-12       
     
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
     
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
     
Resolution: ongoing

2007 ---       Display Patent Litig  Litigation-13      
     
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
     
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
     
Resolution: ongoing

2008-2009      Display Patent Litig  Litigation-14      
     
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
     
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
     
Resolution: out of court settlement      
      
2008-2009       RFID Patent Litig  Litigation-15     
     
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
     
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
     
Resolution: Prevailed in a Summary Judgement issued before the start of the jury trial in Texas.      
      
2009 ---       Display Patent Litig  Litigation-16     
      
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
      
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
      
Resolution: ongoing      
       
2009 ---       Display Patent Litig  Litigation-17      
       
Attorney/Firm: Litigation
       
Responsibilities:  Patent review, analysis, and advice.  Reverse engineering of commercial products.
       
Resolution: ongoing